dedicated to restoring Atlantean Democracy

Lady GaGa’s Hairstylist Quits And Says She’s A Devil Worshipper That Speaks In Tongues With 666 On Her Scalp Read more at

Take a look at what this "Monarch Project" has become. It is now becoming so blatantly obvious, it has surpassed the border of ridiculous and shot straight into ludicrousness. It's very sad really but luckily for that duality thing, if all good thing's must come to an end, so must the bad. But seriously, if this venture into the abyss of demonology + severe traumatic and systematic abuse of a human being from infancy till death can cause a person to float 3 feet above the ground...What the fuck, man? I'll copy and paste the article here.

Liz

Lady GaGa Demonic

After two years, Lady GaGa’s hairstylist Michael Pooter ups and quits claiming that the singer is a certified Devil Worshipper. Michael Pooter says he left because he couldn’t take the way she would stare at him. After being completely creeped out, he asked GaGa to stop and she responds by saying that she will eat his children… REALLY?!?

Michael also says that GaGa was constantly getting drunk off cheap whiskey and recalls this story:

One day, when she was mumbling more than normal, which I found out later was her actually speaking in tongues, I saw the number 666 on her scalp and I quickly asked for God to protect me. She rose up out of her chair and floated 3 feet above the ground while yelling…..”

“YOUR GOD IS NOT HERE MICHAEL. NOR WILL HE EVER BE. NOW GIVE ME SOME MORE HIGHLIGHTS AND TRIM MY BANGS YOU WORTHLESS *beep*”

Jesus has to take the wheel on this one… With all the Illuminati stories floating around this is another to add to the bunch. It’s probably best Michael stays in hiding! What are your thoughts on this?
Read more at http://bossip.com/459007/lady-gagas-hairstylist-quits-and-claims-sh...

0 members like this

Comment by Jonathan Barlow Gee on February 10, 2013 at 11:35am: speaking of "fringe" topics, Liz, ever hear anything weird emanating out of Santa Fe New Mexico? I saw an episode of Jesse Ventura's "Conspiracy Theory" show that was on the topic of time-travel and it identified Santa Fe as a hot-spot I had been previously unaware of. I know about Montauk Point (near NY city) and of course Area 51 (Groom Lake, Nevada), as well as the other DUMBs (at Dulce New Mexico, various air-force bases, Mt. Weather in Shasta Wyoming where NORAD is, below FEMA camps, etc.). The entire mid-western desert is peppered with bases, probably on the same sites as old west "ghost towns" where A-bombs have been repeatedly detonated. Thinking in terms of a globalized network of psychics conducting MK-experiments on the mass populations to keep them unaware of their own natural telepathic condition one could very easily use the model of a cerebral cortex superimposed over the surface of the terrestrial globe, and link the so-called "hot spots" of mass activity to form an "ennegram" in this "planetary-brain" alike the "cosmogenic grid" connecting the "karmic centers" in the "Enochian Communications System." Kinda makes you wonder, hmm? If the planet is being modeled alike a cerebral cortex by a group of psychic conspirators, why would there be so much activity and it be such a "hot spot" in San Diego?

PS. don't mind Mark Dice, he's just a hater. He wrote a book about the modern "Illuminati" dealing heavily with the entertainment industry, and is one of Alex Jones' crew originally, along with the documentarian Jason Bermas and journalist Luke Rudowski. Mark Dice is even more volatile in his opinions about the conspirators than Adam Kokesh, and I expect I'll even be hearing back in a video flame fest for even mentioning him now. Nevertheless, any one of these gentlemen is a more reliable source for news and information than Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, John King or (GAG!) Bill O'Reilly. I won't even mention Glenn Beck, on account of my pet animals being more reliable pundits of human-interest spin than him.

I'm not sure, personally, how much real empathy I can evoke in my own CNS for people who I know, if I met them, would surely hate me and would do anything in their power to assume authority with others over me. I tried reading some Vladimir Illich (Uluonov) Lenin once, until I realized I disagreed with his philosophy and that, if we met, he would probably end up physically beating me up. I have managed to muddle through the first 1/3rd of Hitler's "Mein Kampf" in spite of this fact applying to him also, but I couldn't make it any further than that, even while reading it solely on the can. Knowing that modern MK-research was begun under Hitler by Goebbels and Mengele, and perpetrated long under Lenin and Stalin by the Soviet KGB, and that both were funded by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, owners of the Federal Reserve US central banks' primary shares of stock, it doesn't surprise me much (and I hope wouldn't surprise you too much either) that I have tried to read these authors to find out how they could, even if only to themselves, psychologically justify their ordering and carrying out acts of inhumane mind-control research and application. I think everyone alive during the latter half of the twentieth century could include themselves among the class of victims of mind-control. However, having read these mens' own writings, I can't find any cause in them to justify their belief in them. They are simply evil people, and as such, in a sense, have renounced their own eligibility for belonging to our species, they have sold or otherwise given up their humanity itself. By ritually "selling their soul" to "Satan" in exchange for fame and celebrity while alive, they have allowed their own ego to atrophy and become possessed by the plenum of "Legion" - the djinn or ancient ghosts of our elder ancestors. I have no pity for those who have actively made this choice, and there is no way to convince me a demonically-possessed person (unlike as it is written in Koran can the bodiless djinn) is going to be able to have their "soul saved" and return to the path of knowing right and wrong. As they say about event horizons, once you go black, you never go back.

On the other hand, I'm the opposite of one to lecture about what constitutes "sinful behavior." I don't think there is such a thing. I think anything we are capable of doing we must naturally be allowed to do, and thus there is no such thing as "purity" from temptation toward what "purists" would consider "sin." The condition of humanity's free-will is such that, "if there is a mountain, we will want to climb it, simply because it is there." Likewise, any attempt to dissuade us from doing anything only provokes our kind to want to do it all the more. I believe in the "idea" of sin, of course, who can't - we're virtually not allowed to avoid adopting awareness of it as a notion and forming some kind of positive opinion on it one way or another, thus validating it as an "idea," even though, alike "belief" in "God," there is no physical material evidence for it even existing at all in reality. I just "believe" that the "idea" of "sin" is ONLY an idea, and that it is impossible to prove it exists in reality. That doesn't mean it necessarily is NOT real, only that we can imagine it, but that, although based on exaggerations of reality, it surpasses the capacity to exist as we imagine in reality. Like "heaven," "hell," "God," "Satan," "utopia" and "dystopia," ideal "good" and ideal "evil" are apprehensible to our minds, but not to our actual sensory faculties. I would even posit that those who believe they have suffered "hell on earth" have merely been given a glimpse of sensory-overload such as occurs in a "Near Death Experience" (NDE), and as such merely stood at the gateway of what could have become their immortal condemnation. Some bodies live on without souls or a mind of their own. To be honest, I have more respect for the plants I smoke than for a highly evolved, sentient organism who sacrifices their right to be such in order to emulate the damned elites of old.

I can't think of any worse insult one can hurl in monotheist society than to call a person a "Satanist." However, there are many people who openly flaunt their religious affiliation to LaVey's modern CoS in the celebrity entertainment industry. Aside from in an attempt to aggravate evangelicals (an all too easy proposition), there's little glamor or appeal in this life-style. It makes me wonder, outside of worshipping fiat capital, why one would agree to take this "road less travelled" and openly flaunt their belief in "Satanism." To an atheist, the only thing sillier than "moral monotheism" is "immoral Satanism." Why choose to become famous only as a symbolic anti-hero? But then again, perhaps it isn't a choice. Perhaps, some people are simply born mindless, amoral and greedy for fame and free food. Indeed, perhaps we all are, and it is more difficult to choose not to be so. Therein lies the crux of the "morality question" itself. Why deny our natural instinct, unless it is problematic to our survival? However, without having had a natural instinct, how could we have survived long enough to seek to deny it? Thus, how problematic can natural instinct really be to our survival? And, as Jim Morrison once said, "if it's no problem, why mention it?" Well, I'll leave it at that for now.

PEACE! - Jon

Comment by Lizzy on February 10, 2013 at 4:51pm: True that and I totally agree. It is what it is and all this mind control bullshit we put up with on an every day basis is here for a reason. It must be our destiny to be able to see it and pick it apart and teach people. :0) There is only so much television I can watch before I go into a rant about mind control and mk ultra and child abuse and psychic programming. Holy shit did you say time travel. I'm totally going to watch that video right now.

Comment by Lizzy on February 10, 2013 at 4:59pm: I know there is a lot of UFO activity out in Santa Fe and also some hookey pookey shit too. If I'm not mistaken a lot of self help new age guru type cult activity is going on out there. I know that the actress Shirley Mclain lives out there and has claimed to be visited by aliens, experienced hallucinations and channels spirit's. That Santa Fe and Arizona a also hubs of sacred native american sights. Totally. I'd choose Mark over Diane Sawyer any day, good point. An alleged "illuminati defector" named Svali described San Diego as "the west coast hub of the illuminati". It's a 50/50 chance it could be a lie but with some of the shit that happens here in SD, I wouldn't doubt it's true.

Comment by Jonathan Barlow Gee on February 10, 2013 at 9:56pm: on a Shirley McClain tip:

on a Tesla tip:

Comment by Jonathan Barlow Gee on February 13, 2013 at 9:35am: and now we return you to your regularly scheduled programmer, Lady Gaga, named after the Sumerian name of the planetoid Pluto. http://www.ctvnews.ca/entertainment/lady-gaga-postpones-concerts-af...